![]() |
| Photo by Canadian photographer Andrew Yee in Toronto |
I told the Resident Fan Boy I'd scout ahead for a view of the partial lunar eclipse, seeing as we'd gone up prematurely the night before.
Be to her, Persephone, All the things I might not be; Take her head upon your knee. She that was so proud and wild, Flippant, arrogant and free, She that had no need of me, Is a little lonely child Lost in Hell, -- Persephone, Take her head upon your knee; Say to her, "My dear, my dear, It is not so dreadful here." - Edna St Vincent Millay
![]() |
| Photo by Canadian photographer Andrew Yee in Toronto |
I've been wasting time on an online jigsaw puzzle site, but I justify it with the education I'm getting. I find myself drawn to the artwork ones, a lot of which are pretty damn twee, but there's also a plethora of Manet, Monet, Dürer, Botticelli, and Van Gogh.
Especially Van Gogh.
Tons of Van Gogh.
What fascinates me is how the bits of the puzzle - as I pull them together without referring to the organic original image, thank you very much - are just almost indistinguishable blobs and slashes of colour, or images that I fancy are there. The closer I come to completing it, the colours become stronger and the elements clearer, and the lines more exact. Are my eyes doing the work of bringing the art into focus? Or is it my brain filling in, much as it does when I'm listening to far-off familiar music, that I can't fully hear?
The finished picture is almost unrecognisable from what I have imagined at the beginning.
Is that how great artists work? Placing the lines, strokes, and colours just so, to let the viewer knit them together?
I came across a Van Gogh I didn't know. It was brilliant - clusters of strong colours, looking like a bouquet of bright flowers. As I worked, it became a scene of workers in a yellow field, with oranges and greens and a golden sky.
The painting turned out to be The Red Vineyards near Arle - and apparently, it's the one work for which there's a record of Van Gogh making a sale. It's now in Russia.
Perhaps I'm not wasting my time.
(Yeah, I probably am.)
Garrison Keillor, who has taken gentle, Minnesotan swipes at Unitarians for years, put this up on his blog/newsletter/column/whatever it is this morning:
How many Unitarians does it take to changed a lightbulb? -- "Unitarians believe that incandescent and flourescent and neon are equally valid paths to light, and if, in your journey, you feel the need to change your lightbulb, we will come to your home and recite a poem about radiance and perform a dance about the rising of the sun."
I grew up Unitarian, and still consider myself one.
He's not wrong.
However, I won't be coming to your house to dance around your lifebulb.
Although I do have one that needs changing...