Showing posts with label etiquette. Show all posts
Showing posts with label etiquette. Show all posts

Friday, 25 November 2022

Dividing lines

 

This door locks.
Here's the thing: 

For most of the pandemic, all customers at my local coffee house have used the men's/handicapped washroom, which has one toilet with the main door to the room locking. The ladies' room, which is down the corridor and around the corner, was closed for over a year, and only re-opened a few months ago. This has a change table (rather sexist, I guess, because dads change diapers too), and two cubicles with simple locks. The main door to that room is, of course, unlocked.

Ever since the ladies' room re-opened, I have made a point to choose it, should the need arise, reasoning that I shouldn't use the washroom needed by the fellas and those who need the room to physically maneuver.

One morning, getting ready to leave, I head up the corridor past a man waiting for the locked washroom.  I nod pleasantly to him as I pass the sign posted right next to that door.  It's about eight inches by ten inches, and at eye-level.

I turn the corner, and enter the unlocked room with the two cubicles and a fold-into-the-wall change-table. The door also bears a sign.

In the booth, I hear someone enter the neighbouring booth a few seconds after my arrival. I see shoes under the space below the dividing wall. 

 Nothing unusual about that. 
 Except. 
 They're facing the wrong way.

I leave my cubicle, wash my hands, and while doing so, the fellow I passed in the hall emerges from the other booth.

I give him a startled look over my mask, and say calmly:  "Did you know this is the women's washroom?"
"No, I didn't."
"There's a sign on the door."
"I didn't see it; I'm sorry."  He exits hastily without washing his hands, passing the other sign which he also evidently didn't see, and probably doesn't notice now.

I'm a little taken aback that he clearly followed me into the washroom, but I'm not frightened or offended.  It's interesting how perceptions have shifted over the pandemic.  Not long ago, while waiting for my coffee, I overheard two younger guys waiting for the locked washroom.  One told the other, "There's one around the corner."

"That's the women's washroom," I interjected matter-of-factly, but not belligerently.  I merely wanted to save some embarrassment.  However, I find when women are matter-of-fact, it's interpreted as belligerent.  

The fellow who exited hastily moments ago is at his table with his female companion when I return, probably relating his adventure.  He catches my eye, and looks away.


In a recent online discussion on one of the social platforms, one woman gave the most sensible comment I'd heard on the topic.
"If I were a man intent on attacking women in a washroom," she said, "I wouldn't dress as a woman; I'd simply carry a mop."

I mentioned my washroom incident to elder daughter in London on our weekly Skype call.  To my surprise, she seemed puzzled that I should be uncomfortable with a male stranger in a neighbouring bathroom cubicle.  

Am I being odd? I have nipped in to a designated men's washroom when in a hurry, but never one that takes more than one person, and certainly never with a man in there. Am I really being outlandish?  Is it decades of antiquated conditioning?  As someone who has spent a great deal of time in the line-up for the women's washroom, I don't think it's particularly equitable to let the guys in. 

And just for the record, I'm fine sharing the washroom with trans women. (Which way do their feet face?)

Saturday, 6 November 2021

FaceTime follies


I was at the coffee shop (yes, again) when my phone began to ring. 

This doesn't happen often; most of my messages come by text or email, so I scrambled to get my phone out of my pocket. It turned out to be a FaceTime call from elder daughter in London. 

Elder daughter doesn't usually phone or FaceTime me unless it's urgent, so I fumbled for the buttons, and succeeded in hanging up on her. 

I called back. It took a couple of tries, but when I got her image, it became evident that we weren't getting a clear signal. I still didn't know what this call was about, and intent upon my phone screen, I took a couple of seconds to register that someone was standing by my table. 

It was an older lady. She didn't look pleased.

"Would you put in earbuds?" she snapped.

I've taken FaceTime calls in the coffee shop with no problems before - after all, people do converse in person and on the phone in coffee shops, but I focussed back on my daughter, keep my voice light and level.

"Darling, I'm getting a complaint about the noise.  Shall I call you?"

Elder daughter quickly retreated, and suggested texts, to keep me out of trouble with "other patrons".

Elder coffeehouse patron had returned to her table, calling out a stiff "Thank you".  I ignored this.

It turned out to not be an emergency at all, but a source of excitement.

If I were looking up a genealogical event online, she asked, would I look it up under "family" or "hobby"?
"Well, neither," I replied, somewhat baffled.  

I don't look up events; I usually get notified about them via blogs I follow, or the social media pertaining to groups to which I belong.

The reason she was asking is because she works in a 410-year-old building in Greenwich called Charlton House, and the archivist is being featured on an upcoming episode of Who Do You Think You Are? - featuring singer/songwriter Pixie Lott.  

I own the seasons of WDYTYA (the original British version, that is) up until 2019, but current episodes won't be available on DVD for several months.  John Reid has been alerting his faithful readers of episodes that appear briefly on YouTube before the BBC yanks them down.  I can only hope.

As I packed up my journals, the elder coffeehouse patron strolled off to the washroom, and to my surprise, the coffeehouse proprietor came swiftly to my table and, putting her arm around my shoulder, asked if I were all right.  

"We always want you to feel welcome here."

I hastily explained that it hadn't been a fight, although I don't see a warm friendship springing up from that quarter.

I was touched and, in an odd way, healed, feeling a bit like I'd been in the right.

Probably not quite. As I explained to the proprietor, it drives me nuts when people watch sports or listen to music without earbuds in cafés, mainly because it fights with the piped-in music, so I wasn't entirely unsympathetic to the elderly coffee-house patron.  

But no, we won't be friends.

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

Peeping Thomasinas

I was standing in my bedroom with my coat on, waiting for younger daughter to emerge from her own bedroom and gazing out the window, when I saw a woman peering around the corner into my room.

My bedroom is tucked in almost behind the pathway leading to our building's front door. This is usually not a problem; one would have to know that the window is there, and make the effort to lean around the partition -- which is what made this apparition disturbing.

I wasn't frightened, just a bit annoyed, even more so, when her companion, standing out on the sidewalk that follows the street, pointed me out, and the woman's fingers appeared as she gripped the wall to lean sideways to peer again.

I turned and stalked from the room. (I should have tugged the blind down.) I wondered what on earth was going on. Two units in our building are on the market. Were the women there for a viewing, and if so, where was their realtor, who would normally let them in? Were they visitors flummoxed by the entry-phone? Someone should tell them that looking into private windows is rather creepy.

I decided to leave by the side entrance in order to avoid them. No luck. As I rounded the corner into the small side parking lot, I nearly ran into the Peeping Thomasina, who was being followed, at a slight distance, by her companion, who smiled faintly at me as I passed. I returned a stony sidelong glance.

Younger daughter and I strode up the sidewalk en route to her voice lesson, as I suddenly wondered if the women had been able to slip into the building as younger daughter, trailing me by a few steps, exited.

"I was wondering if those two women in the parking lot...."
"What two women?"
"They passed us as we left."
"I didn't see them."

Great. Spooky as well as creepy.

Wednesday, 19 December 2018

Double-takes and ladders (Write of Passage Number Forty-eight)

It's a double-decker, but late afternoon on the last Wednesday before Christmas, and most of the seats are taken near the front. I squeeze to the back, where the long rear seat is unoccupied.

I'm rather startled when a young woman plops down next to me, as it isn't elder daughter, in town for Christmas and - I'd thought - on my heels. This girl is long and lanky, with laddered black leggings that she has evidently shredded herself. (I gather this is a thing.) She looks a bit tired -- or stoned. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt.

Elder daughter slides into the seat facing me, and we exchange glances. As the bus rolls on, I remark, glancing up at the lack of headroom directly above my seat,"Good opportunities for concussion here, when we try to get out."

Before my daughter can reply, laddered lady drawls, "Yeah." After a pause, she adds, "I always come close to crashing down the stairs from the upper level."

This is Victoria, so I smile and nod amicably, while elder daughter carefully covers her confusion.

We all alight at the same stop - none of us has bumped our heads - and we see laddered lady saunter out ahead of us across Fort Street.

"That was so bizarre," chuckles elder daughter, who has lived in Hades for eighteen of her twenty-six years. "She thought you must have been a friendly lady just randomly chatting to her."

That's how we roll here, toots. Anyhow, judging the direction she's taken, she may very well be a neighbour in our building.

Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Queues and pews

There's an Ottawa mentality about queuing and seating. Oh, I'm sure similar attitudes exist elsewhere, but here in Hades, it's just so damn noticeable.

Recently, the Resident Fan Boy, younger daughter, and I went to the first screening of the day at the Bytowne Cinema. We, and some others, were standing around in a scattered sort of semi-circle, waiting for the box office to open in about five minutes. An older lady asked me, "Is this the line?"
"No," I replied.
"Well," she said. "Maybe it's time to start one." And she actually reached out to nudge me into place.

I looked around in disbelief. I could see the staff dismantling the locks and setting out the signs. There were no more than ten people standing outside. Ignoring her, I moved toward the opening door, following those who had arrived before us and who weren't in line either.

The Resident Fan Boy and younger daughter went in to get our preferred seats, the ones on the left side of the left aisle. We've discovered from years of attending films at the Bytowne that our view is unimpeded, few people sit there, and it unlikely anyone will clamber over you to sit by the wall. They saved me a seat directly in front, while I fetched the popcorn.

Unfortunately, they'd chosen seats two rows behind Line-up Lady. This would normally be no problem because of the way the seats are staggered, I'd have a clear view over her right shoulder. After a few minutes, the film not having started, she got up, paused meaningfully by my seat and informed me that she was moving because the smell of popcorn made her ill. I cheerfully made sympathetic noises, because I find, on the whole, refusing to take the bait from someone who's annoyed with you for the egregious sin of eating popcorn in a cinema - just for an example - is far more satisfying in the long run.

So, a few days later, we arrived in good time for a performance by the guitar virtuosi Assad Brothers at Dominion-Chalmers United Church. The Resident Fan Boy, a veteran of many years of Chamberfest seating wars, hurried to the balcony where our season tickets are, and sat to the far left of our pew. The tickets give you the section, pew number, but no seat assignment, simply ending with the word "Pew", so, if you're early enough, you can stake out the part of the pew closest to the central view of the stage. The view is perfectly reasonable from other parts of the pew, but, hey, there has to be some perk for showing up early.

I put my coat on my spot and dashed off to the washroom, because the line-up at Intermission is a nightmare, especially with a sold-out audience. When I returned, I found another older lady standing by my coat and looking pointedly at it. Under her watchful gaze, I carefully rolled up my coat, stowed it under the pew, and took my place next to my husband, feeling somehow that I had broken some secret rule. She remained standing, as a couple established themselves at the other end of the pew. Eventually, a gentleman greeted her and they sat down.

Meanwhile, in front of us, another mini-drama was unfolding. A lady was trying to explain to the couple in front of us that she had reserved seating on the prized left end of the pew, that is, dead-centre in the front row of the balcony.

She was holding up a fairly sizeable plastic laminated square, which read: "Reserved". Apparently, the female half of the couple had been sitting on it. I watched as the reservation lady calmly and patiently explained the situation, apparently to no avail. The other lady was making sweeping gestures towards other parts of the balcony. Eventually, one of the volunteers joined the conversation, and the couple made room. Elder daughter explained to me later that the reservation lady is a major patron of Chamberfest; in fact, it is safe to say the concert was taking place thanks to her support. She has to claim and explain her reservation every damn time.

The concert eventually started after a bus-load of Montreal music students rumbled into the upper balcony pews about fifteen minutes after the show was due to start. The brothers rippled and nodded. I've never heard nor sensed such an intent audience.

This was my favourite, particularly the "Musette Rondeau", which is about at the 3:50 mark in this video.

From our pew, their bent legs made them look a bit like Muppets.

Saturday, 28 May 2016

Left to her own device

I'd been waiting to see The Shakespeare Show for over a month. I mean, it's clearly my kind of entertainment: Shakespeare, David Tennant, Shakespeare, the cream of Britain's acting community with a couple of foreigners thrown in, Shakespeare, ballet, Shakespeare, musical theatre, Shakespeare, jazz, Shakespeare....

We arrived at the cinema early enough to snag our favourite seats in the middle of the back row. Soon, I was in my element. I even enjoyed the intense hip-hop performance about a quarter of the way into the two-hour show. That's when I started to become distracted by a bright light to my left.

A woman seated about four empty seats over appeared to be reading in a Kindle-like fashion on what was either a very large phone, or a very small tablet. She sat like a toad in white capris, with the device held out in front of her. Each time she shifted or tapped the screen, the glow would change and draw my eye back. I held up my ticket print-out to shield the left side of my face, and endeavoured to ignore her.

Every now and then, she'd set the device aside - presumably when something interested her in this pageant chockfull of different styles of delight. I let my hand fall, but shortly, the bright light was bobbing again.

As heaven is my witness, she was watching a video.

I debated inwardly. Should I take action? I wanted to throw something at her, or better still, hurl her damn device down to the bottom of the theatre, but that would cause more problems than it would solve, and a woman who comes to a special showing of a once-in-a-lifetime event and spends it reading and watching videos is probably not in the best of mental health herself.

What do you suppose would be her rationale?

I'm in the back row.

I don't have the sound on.

There's no one sitting immediately next to me.

I don't give a #*&@$%.

Most likely, she hadn't given this any thought at all.

About three quarters of the way through, she packed up and left. I sagged with relief, and settled to watch the show.

The two young men in front of us started texting.

Now, these guys were in some danger, because I was reaching the end of my rope and they were within an arm's reach. We were also watching Othello strangling Desdemona, and Lady Macbeth brandishing bloody daggers - fuel for my darkening fantasies.

These remained fantasies because I didn't want to embarrass my family nor disturb the other patrons who were attentively appreciating Judy Dench, Ian McKellan, Helen Mirren, and a host of others. Elder daughter, alas, picked up on my body language and thought it was directed at her. The Resident Fan Boy and younger daughter were having a lovely time, being on the right side of elder daughter.

The lights came up and as I descended the side stairs, I mentioned the lady with a device to two kindly women preparing to leave. They gazed at me in astonishment: "Why did she come?"

That is the question.

The following is a much-discussed (and much shared) portion of the evening, featuring several Hamlets bickering over the correct delivery of the opening lines of the most famous soliloquy in English theatre. The "Hamlets" are, in order of appearance: Paapa Essiedu (the most recent of the Royal Shakepeare Company's Hamlets, age 25), Tim Minchin (Australian songwriter, comedian, and a particular favourite of elder daughter), Benedict Cumberbatch (being mistaken for Eddie Redmayne here), Dame Harriet Walter (an accomplished stage actress who is also known for films such as 1996's Sense and Sensibility, and is a niece of the late Christopher Lee), David Tennant, Rory Kinnear (apart from his stage accomplishments, a son of Richard Lester favourite Roy Kinnear), Sir Ian McKellen, Dame Judi Dench, and some guy from the audience.

What isn't shown in the clip is the aftermath. Paapa Essiedu, after all this hilarity, still has to deliver the soliloquy and win back the audience. (He does.)


'To be or not to be_' featuring Benedict Cumberbatch & Prince Charles - Shakespeare Live! - BBC from Mai Martin on Vimeo.

Sunday, 28 September 2014

Whose side are you on?

This is fun, but is she portraying an office bully, or someone surrounded by idiots?

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

Double feature

I've always tried to see a healthy percentage of Oscar-nominated films before the big ceremony, if only to give me enough knowledge to cheer or boo.  It was tough enough with five nominated films, but since they upped the maximum to ten, my percentages have been pretty dismal.

This year, nine films have been nominated.  I have no intention of seeing 12 Years a Slave (too squeamish), Gravity (too block-bustery and epic), Captain Phillips (ditto), or The Wolf of Wall Street. (Dubious entrepreneurs and scantily-dressed women? Again?  Give me a break.)  I missed an opportunity to see Nebraska a couple of weeks ago, due to rotten weather and too much else going on.  We saw Philomena over the Christmas break, and Her about ten days ago.

Yesterday was cold, but clear, and I had the chance to catch a morning screening of Dallas Buyers Club.

Rainbow Cinemas is a second-run franchise with half a dozen theatres in Ontario (four of which are in Toronto -- a place that loves its movies), and two in Saskatchewan.  The one in Ottawa is a little bleak, being in the lower level of the St Laurent Shopping Mall nestled between a business college and a fitness centre, but the staff is pleasant and the prices are reasonable.

Very reasonable yesterday, which turned out to be "$2.50 Tuesday".  This meant a rather better turn-out than one might expect for a 10 am show.  It also meant an older crowd, which included people turning up who might not ordinarily choose such a movie.

Dallas Buyers Club is based on a true story and as such, probably had very little to do with what actually happened.  This doesn't trouble me that much; most "true" films cannot afford to be that accurate, because they need to tell an entertaining story in a limited amount of time.  As it was, the film is longer than a lot of movies these days, just under two hours.  (Feels longer.)

Although the real Ron Woodroof was apparently not quite as tough and homophobic as portrayed by Matthew McConaughey, the film does capture the terror of AIDS in the eighties, when a diagnosis was an automatic death sentence, and AIDS patients were ostracized and feared.  I was a hospice volunteer in Victoria, and for the first few years that AIDS patients began being admitted, the true nature of their illness was not made public (although we volunteers were usually allowed to know), for fear of the janitorial staff refusing to clean their rooms.

Our "$2.50 Tuesdays" crowd had a touch of that eighties hostility.  It was, as I've mentioned, an older crowd and a couple of fellows apparently thought they were home watching television.  One guy kept saying, "Hurry up and die," and got into a shouting match with an elderly man who shouted "Asshole!" several times after him as he left the theatre which was odd, because the elderly man had been commenting throughout the film himself.

Leto with post-Felicity-and-Alias Garner
I managed to concentrate despite the interruptions.  I was more distracted by remembering Jennifer Garner and Jared Leto from their nineties television careers, to tell you the truth.
Leto in "My So-called Life" with Claire Danes

How did I feel about the flick? Well, if we're continuing to be truthful, I only went to see this because elder daughter requested it. I think it was well-done, but if actors are competent (and these were), is it really necessary to go through the frankly dangerous weight-changes to make us believe how sick they are?

On the whole, I was rather glad I'd only paid $2.50.

That evening, I was out at a cinema again, snatching my only opportunity to see at least one of the nominees for best foreign language film.  Besides, I had heard good things about The Great Beauty.

The Bytowne Cinema is a very different venue from Rainbow Cinemas.  It shows mainly art-house films and is a glorious old theatre with a huge screen and a balcony, if you please.  The clientele probably don't frequent the St Laurent Shopping Mall much either.

Then there was the film which was Italian.  Very Italian. The story -- if you can call it a story; it's really more a parade of beautiful images -- follows a fellow who has just celebrated turning 65 by having a large bacchanalia on a rooftop in Rome (his posh apartment overlooks the Coliseum, doncha know) and is now contemplating mortality when he's not having meals with friends or having sex with women.  Of course, this being an Italian film, the women are in their forties, rather than in their twenties as in a Hollywood production.

Mind you, it didn't help when I fell asleep and woke up in the middle of a funeral scene. (No, it wasn't due to boredom; I was just really comfortable.)  There was more than one possibility for the dear departed and I was further confused when one of these candidates turned up in the next scene, appeared to die, then didn't.  Then her father was being consoled a couple of scenes later.

And that was only halfway through the film.

Anyway, the cinematography was lovely; the music was evocative (Tavener, Gorecki, etc.).  My favourite bit was actually the ending credits, which play over the view from a boat moving steadily up (or down) the Tiber in the half-light of dawn (or dusk).

Then I got up and made my way home over the ice flows.

Tomorrow night, if it isn't too grim, I'm off to see American Hustle, which, if nothing else, will mean I've seen at least one performance in each nominated category.

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

Chair wars at Agincourt

(Photo: Andrew Alexander)

I dread festival seating anywhere , but particularly in Hades.  It's a competitive city and this spills over into their arts scene.  The Resident Fan Boy says this reaches its epitome during the annual summertime Chamber Music Festival where patrons will line up for hours to acquire a painful pew (concerts are usually in churches) a shade closer to front and centre.

So, last evening, the RFB, elder daughter, younger daughter and I set off with two camp chairs and a large blanket, so that daughters could sit at the improvised footlights near the makeshift stage while their parents sat in relative comfort a bit further back.  A fast-and-loose interpretation of Shakespeare's Henry V by the Company of Fools was in the offing.  We'd been looking forward to it for weeks, and for the past four summers, have had no problems with the seating arrangements, which are first come, furthest forward; blankets in front of camp chairs.

Two little wrinkles, though.  This was the only presentation we could see of the production before younger daughter and I depart for Victoria and it was opening night. ( Those were not the wrinkles; we usually attend opening night for much the same reason.)  The show fell, unusually, on a holiday Monday because Canada Day fell on a Sunday, which meant we were dealing with Sunday schedule buses which, in turn, meant we arrived at Strathcona Park in Sandy Hill about forty minutes before showtime.  So, for the first time, we found ourselves with the opportunity of setting up our chairs in the front row.  Directly ahead of us was the swathe of lawn designed for those willing to sit on blankets, a long string demarcating the performance area.  Two Adirondack chairs were front and centre behind the "blanket zone"; these were festooned with crepe and  a length of bungee cord was spread on the ground in front of them with the ends curving around the sides.  A bit confused, I sought out a volunteer to direct us where to set up, thinking the pair of thrones might also indicate where an aisle was to be, as has happened sometimes in the Camosun College Summer Shakespeare in Victoria.

No, the volunteer assured us, there would be no centre aisle and we were welcome to set up our chairs in line with the "VIP seating", leaving the space in front for people who would be seated on the ground.  We settled in, but not before shoving our chairs over to accommodate a lady who also wanted to sit in the front row.  We read our programmes and Scott Florence, one of the Fools' founders, directed camp-chair-sitters further back on our extreme right to move closer in and a form a semi circle.

Things were hunky-dory until the volunteers became occupied elsewhere, and a rather perma-pressed family of three bearing three royal blue camp-chairs set up in the blanket zone on the extreme left.  The RFB and I noted them uneasily, but they were, I guess, far enough to the left to not excite comment.  Shortly afterwards, a well-groomed couple showed up with regal red camp chairs and lined them up with the royal blue camp chairs.  Someone questioned this, but the very blonde lady loudly announced that the blue bungee cord was clearly only meant to pick out the VIP chairs.  This was the signal for an elderly lady seated a row back to move her chair directly in front of the VIP chairs.  This was too much for the woman on our right who had been discussing the emerging situation indignantly with the RFB.  She scurried off in search of a volunteer, who returned, and gently got the new line of chairs to move back --- but only a few inches, and still firmly in front of the chairs that had been there first.

Now a middle-age couple strode in and set up their small wooden collapsible chairs smack-dab ahead of the Resident Fan Boy and me.  We knew swift action was needed.

"Excuse us," we said firmly, with some support from the indignant woman next to us.  "We were told to put our chairs back here; that area is designated for blankets."
 Wooden collapsible lady looked at us in disbelief, her confusion, no doubt, not helped by the half row of camp-chairs to our left.
"These are very small chairs," she protested.
We persisted and the couple backed down and set up over to the right, directly in front of some other people who had arrived earlier, but didn't care to press the point.  It was true the couple's chairs were small, what are called "low profile" by those who sell them, but I noticed the lady's head was at the same level of those behind her; she was rather statuesque.  I still think they were being rather unfair to the people who had gone through the trouble to come earlier, but no doubt they were quietly discussing how unreasonable we were being.

A trio of older people set up their blanket at the feet of  the Resident Fan Boy and Indignant Woman.  They apologised for sitting there, if you please.  The Resident Fan Boy assured them that they were in the right spot and Indignant Woman added mischievously:  "We've been waiting for you..."

I don't enjoy standing up for myself, so my nerves were still jangling when the play began. I was worried that the pre-show drama would overshadow the play itself, which began when a man climbed into a chest in the stage, begged us not to give him away and disappeared as a quartet of giggling women, also dressed in sky-blue golf-shirts and plaid Bermudas ran up and looked at us questioningly. 
"He's in the chest," called a quisling from the crowd, and when they gingerly lifted the lid, the man sprang up like a jack-in-the-box and proclaimed:  "O, for a muse of fire..."

The play had begun, one of William Shakespeare's history plays (which have more to do with propaganda than history), and the five actors, four sock puppets, and one talking stuffed bear took on more than twenty-five parts to tell the story of the warrior king Henry the Five and the Battle of Agincourt, through songs, nursery rhymes, swordplay, cross-dressing, puppetry, and in the true tradition of Shakespearean theatre, really, really bad accents.  We knew the French were the French because they had pretty hats and accused us of smelling of elderberries.  We knew Fluellen was Welsh because he (well, she) had a large leek drawn on his (her) chest. We figured out that MacMorris was Irish through geographical references and frankly, I'm not sure what Captain Gower was supposed to be because I couldn't place his/her accent. (Captain Jamy is supposed to be the Scots officer but didn't seem to get a look-in in this version.  For what it's worth, I think the accents were bad on purpose....)

So how do you make Henry the Fifth palatable, accessible, and even a wee bit comprehensible to an audience that ranges from preschoolers to people who have been alive a long time?  The Fools use humour whenever possible and for them, that's most of the time.  The result was indeed very funny, sometimes unexpectedly touching, and occasionally surreal.  For example, when the trio of traitors Cambridge, Grey and Scrope were executed for their treachery, they helpfully hanged themselves by raising the nooses over their heads and leaning a little, and singing "The Big Ship Sails on the Alli-alli-o".  The murder of the pages was shown through the dismemberment of the stuffed bear puppet, done in a cartoon-like fashion so that the children in the audience would have no doubt that this is play-acting.  But the reaction of King Henry to the slaughter was not drained of  grief and horror and when the remains of the puppet were tenderly put in a tiny black coffin and borne away with a mournful song, it was genuinely sad.

Margo MacDonald, a co-founder of A Company of Fools, played Henry absolutely straight and the stirring speeches "Once more into the breach..." and "We happy few" were just that, enthralling.  Perhaps her biggest challenge was the courtship scene in which she wooed Simon Bradshaw, the sole male cast-member who was decked out in ringlets and clearly channeling Lucy Van Peldt.

By the end of the play, all seating silliness was forgotten and loud cheering ensued. The caps were passed and I made sure our contribution matched the fun we'd had on a rather lovely summer evening in a beautiful park seeing a play that was, after all, not that far from Shakespeare intended.
That's what I'd like to think, anyway.

And the VIPs?  They turned out to be nice people.  The wife was a prize-winning journalist, so, in the line-up for free ice cream,  her proud husband promoted her, and I madly promoted elder daughter and.... 

Gee, I've been in Ottawa too long.

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

Very supercilious (write of passage number twenty-five)

I have a number of issues with the Number Five bus.  It's the best bus for getting to the Resident Fan Boy's church, and goes up Elgin, which is my favourite street in Hades.  However, it has to be the least reliable route in the OC Transpo system, and that's saying something.  It also gets assigned the least ergonomic buses, usually the kind where the aisle at the rear narrows down so much that you have to move sideways to exit at the rear.

On this particular day, there are several people standing near the back, and our stop is approaching and being on the Number Five, we're late, so I decide to leave from the front of the bus, giving myself plenty of time.  There is a young man standing in the aisle, deep in conversation with someone who is sitting down.  I approach him,  wait a few beats for him to notice that I am standing behind him, and when he doesn't, I smile pleasantly and expectantly, saying, "Excuse me," in what I take to be a cheerful tone.

His reaction is very much like the fellows in the above photo, although he isn't wearing face powder or a white wig.  He straightens up, fixing me with an offended stare, and slowly, with great ceremony, switches his back pack, which is also quite effectively blocking my way, from one shoulder to the other before cooly waving me through.  I watch this performance in some bemusement, wondering what rule in this guy's private code I've just broken.  I suppose he could be operating on the assumption that I have interrupted his conversation, but I (ass that I am) have always thought that this doesn't really apply when one is blocking an aisle in the bus.

I  thank him warmly for moving aside.  I'm thinking, in that uncharitable way that I have, that this is far more likely to irritate him than if I give in to my initial impulse to throttle him.