This has to be some kind of new record for me. I've seen seven of the nine Oscar nominations for Best Picture this year, and I would have seen eight, if this weren't Victoria, where movies rarely stay for more than a week or so. However, Victoria is also the reason I've seen the seven films; we now live within easy walking distance of two of the city's four multiplexes, and one of the city's two art-house cinemas. (Also, this is one year when I actually wanted to see most of the films -- except Get Out, because I'm not great with horror flicks, no matter how witty.)
One film I caught last summer. Younger daughter wanted to see Dunkirk because Harry Styles is in it. I was keen to see Kenneth Branagh and Mark Rylance. It was clever and sprawling; I'm not sure it would work on a small screen.
We saw The Darkest Hour because Gary Oldman is a front-runner for Best Actor. Excellent cast, dark, bleak -- and I'm afraid I nodded off at one point. Woke up and Churchill was sitting in the Underground - had no idea why.
The Post is another Stephen Spielberg patriotic epic; it reminded me strongly of Lincoln in scope and attitude. It's set up - probably not deliberately - to segue into 1976's All the President's Men. It has Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep, fer gawd's sake, and has proved to be extraordinarily well-timed. Recent events in the current American administration have made it all too pertinent, and there's more than a nod to the renewed awareness of women's rights - or lack thereof.
Lady Bird was our New Year's Day film this year. I like Saoirse Ronan, and have always adored Laurie Metcalf. The film is charming, heartbreaking - and also a bit alarming that we're clearly moving into Aughties nostalgia - the film is set between Autumn 2002 and 2003.
The Resident Fan Boy loved The Shape of Water -- I didn't. He says it's because I'm not crazy about science fiction. Maybe he's right. I thought the art direction was amazing, with the feel of the early 1960s -- even though there's not enough men wearing hats; they wore hats, people. However, I didn't enjoy the gratuitous violence, particularly an unnecessary scene showing the villain rutting his helpless wife. This was a long movie, that somehow didn't find the time for character development.
Elder daughter particularly wanted to see Call Me By Your Name. I don't think she did, but I just managed to catch it yesterday, when it showed up unexpectedly at the art-house cinema. It's undeniably well-done, and is being sold as a bitter-sweet coming-of-age flick. Okay, a seventeen-year-old boy falls in love with a twenty-four-year-old man. It's 1983, just before AIDS became well-known. It's Italy. The parents are unobtrusive, and understanding - as is the shoved-to-one-side girlfriend. Suppose females were cast in the lead roles. Would it be believable? Would it be uncomfortable, rather than bitter-sweet?
Which brings me to Three Billboards Outside of Ebbing, Missouri, a film I was rather scared to see, as I've seen a live production of The Pillowman, and a "live-stream" Cineplex presentation of an English production of Hangmen, both harrowing, both by Martin McDonagh, who wrote and directed this film. I did know that this would mean fabulous writing. And I adore Frances McDormand.
So I went. By myself. And was engrossed.
Wonderful acting. Character development. Unpredictable plot. We have a winner.
Tonight, I'll watch the Academy Awards. I may be tempted to throw snack food at the screen, although, if Three Billboards doesn't win it, I'll be fine if Lady Bird does. I have a feeling The Shape of Water will win, so I'm keeping the vacuum cleaner charged.
LAC Co-Lab Update for December
-
There are currently 4,096 items in LAC’s Collection Search identified as
Co-Lab-only contributions, up from 4,092 in November. Here is the progress
on th...
21 hours ago