I was an ESL (English as a Second Language - they call it something else now) teacher in my young adulthood, before second daughter arrived, and I discovered my ESL training would come in handy, even if I couldn't figure out what her first language was.
During one of the sessions in which I was an instructor, there was a 1960s theme dance. Instead of my usual bun - pinned up primly for my students, who were only a few years' my junior, yet thought I was as old as the hills (I didn't disabuse them of this notion) - I wore my hair down and donned one of those floaty, Indian-made frocks that usually sway on racks in front of the funkier shops.
I was standing with a fellow-teacher, when two Québecois students (not, thankfully, mine) approached.
"You look good," remarked one. "But then, it's your epoch, no?"
For the record, the sixties were not my era.
Last Sunday, we decided to support my Friend Who Sings and Gardens by attending a concert being given by her community choir. This too was a Sixties theme, featuring lots of favourites from the late sixties and early seventies.
Most of the choir members had chosen to wear flower-power clothes. The Resident Fan Boy joked that they had raided the backs of their closets - they looked pretty authentic - but, oh, it really hit me as I gazed at them, that these clothes celebrating the cult of youth make older people look ancient.
We've seen the choir several times; the members are on the mature side, but, dressed in evening wear, it's not the first thing you think of. The tie-dyes, colourful prints, and scarves wrapped around their foreheads merely emphasized the years that have rocked and rolled away.
After intermission, they returned, dressed in circus garb, which, oddly, was more flattering.
This performance was in aid of a kids' choir programme set up some twenty years ago in the elementary schools. Before that, most schools had their own glee clubs, run by teachers, and there was class time set aside for singing, even if a school pageant wasn't planned. I know, from following both daughters through the school system, that this is no longer the case. You only get arts education if someone funds it.
So, in contrast to the aging hippies in the risers, several dozen children in gauzy white tops and dresses, looking to be mostly in the six-to-seven-year-old range, were guided on to the stage. It really looked like herding kittens.
Once all the kids -- from the four elementary schools where the programme is run - had been shoe-horned into place, they sang three songs, and there was something to watch wherever you looked.
Three girls clutched hands, looking for all the world like a high school clique in bud. While many of the ankle-biters zoned in and out of concentration, one girl focussed on the director determinedly, singing as if the world depended on it. Another had a similar focus, but on the audience on one side. She stepped away from the others, angled her body to that section of the auditorium, and sang loudly and expressively.
It was a helluvan act to follow. No wonder the grown-ups dressed up.
When They Go High, You Go Logo
-
I love a good hand-piped logo wreck. It says, "YAY TEAM!" without all that
pretentious "artistry" and/or "talent."
For instance, bakers, you *know* that ...
4 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment